Compare

Pick the right blockchain data API

Honest, head-to-head comparisons of SQD against the alternatives. Pricing, chain coverage, latency, validation, and self-hosting, measured the same way for both sides.

  1. Apps & products
    Wallets Tax Payments KYC RWA
  2. Intelligence
    Comparison coming soon Comparison coming soon Comparison coming soon Comparison coming soon Comparison coming soon
  3. Protocol analytics
    Dune Comparison coming soon
  4. Indexed data
  5. Our focus
    Read-side infrastructure
    SQD decentralized, validated, multi-chain at source
  6. Node providers

Tier 01

Indexed data & data APIs

Direct peers in the read-side data layer. Indexers, decoded-data vendors, multi-chain APIs.

Tier 02

Node providers

RPC and node infrastructure.

Tier 03

Intelligence & analytics

Downstream consumers of read-side data. Compare on raw data access vs higher-level dashboards and signals.

SQD vs Chainalysis
Coming soon

Compliance-focused blockchain analytics vs raw decoded data. Compare on data access, investigation tooling, and source-data control.

SQD vs Arkham
Coming soon

Onchain intelligence with entity labels vs decoded raw data. Compare on data freshness, coverage, and licensing.

SQD vs Nansen
Coming soon

Wallet intelligence and dashboards vs raw indexed data. Compare on underlying data sourcing and customization.

SQD vs Amberdata
Coming soon

Institutional crypto market and onchain data vs read-side infrastructure. Compare on data delivery model and chain coverage.

SQD vs Kaiko
Coming soon

Institutional market data and indices vs decoded onchain data. Compare on what each platform actually serves.

SQD vs Dune

SQL queries on indexed blockchain data vs read-side infrastructure that feeds them. Compare on the layer each owns.

SQD vs DefiLlama
Coming soon

Open-source DeFi protocol analytics vs raw chain data. Compare on aggregated TVL feeds vs ground-truth indexed data.

The SQD edge

What stays true across every comparison

The head-to-head pages cover each competitor in detail. These hold regardless of which one you are weighing SQD against.

Every major VM, one provider

EVM, Solana, Substrate, Bitcoin, and Hyperliquid through one endpoint. You can index a chain’s EVM and its Substrate runtime from the same provider, for example Bittensor’s EVM (chain 964) and Bittensor’s Substrate chain. Ponder and Envio are EVM-first; neither indexes Substrate or Bitcoin.

Hyperliquid beyond HyperEVM

Most providers stop at the HyperEVM chain. SQD also indexes Hyperliquid’s native HyperCore fills, with direction, PnL, and fees. More HyperCore data can be added on demand, both as new Portal datasets and via the SDK.

Solana, fully decoded

Instructions, accounts, and token balances with Anchor / IDL decoding, from slot 0 (genesis) to the head. Ponder has no Solana; Envio’s is early and not IDL-decoded.

No API key to start

The public Portal serves decoded data across every chain with no key, no card, and no token. Competitors typically need a paid RPC plan or an API token to fetch data.

Decoded and validated, not raw

Decoded data out of the box with 6-step validation at ingestion, instead of raw RPC responses you decode and reorg-handle yourself.

Open and decentralized

Open-source and self-hostable, served by a decentralized network of operators rather than a single hosted backend.

Indexed by SQD

225+ networks across EVM, Solana, Substrate, Bitcoin, and Hyperliquid. One endpoint, one contract.